An everyday perspective on today's art scene.

Art serves many purposes but increasingly, today’s public asks that it either inform or entertain an increasingly engaged yet generally unfamiliar general public. This is a simple guide for those seeking to work past intimidating gallery owners or over-eager docents and interns for a chance to approach these creative works on one’s own terms – if a show interests you, click on the link or Google the artist – they will be glad to assist you.

Text and Images are copyrighted by contributor(s).

Monday, February 4, 2013

Painter Painter pt 1 of 3, Walker Art Center



Painter Painter
Walker Art Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
02 Feb – 27 Oct, 2013

Part 1:  the process

Painter Painter has the potential of being both theoretically progressive and informative in terms of content (the works and artists displayed), and I was privileged to be attendance as Michelle Grabner, Jan Verwoert and Bruce Hainley led participating artists and the Center’s members in presentations and group discussion of the meaning behind the show. 

    For me, it was my first time in the new Walker Auditorium.  The room was cozy, intimate and perfectly theatrical – we could easily have been in any one of thousands of commercial theatre venues across America – only then we would have had sodas, popcorn and even more cushy seats.  This thought was to stay with me throughout the event – an interfering static.  The discussion resembled a business conference or trades meeting in a busy airport, complete with schedules, overhead announcements and stewardesses (my apologies to the volunteer ushers).
    The students and audience were professionally engaged and polite (and non-native), and we could leave the event with mandatory cookies and cocoa and a receipt for having attended a continuing ed seminar.  We were re-assured that our city has made its mark on the visual arts scene without forcing us to accept any major influence on our own more pedestrian life-styles.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Ed I. Koch, Mayor (1924-2013)



Ed Koch, the Man, the Myth, the Artistic Legacy 1924-2013
(edited 05 Feb 2013)
    We will all greatly miss Mayor Ed Koch – a man whose personality was as big as Manhattan – the man who probably has come closest to meeting every resident of said city and has represented the city to non-New Yorkers for decades.  He was, he always will be, bigger than life.  Even his passing, the day his autobiographical film opens to the public in theatres and the day Grand Central Station, a landmark he was instrumental, as Congressperson, in helping save from demolition, turned 100, and 11 years after the murder of Daniel Pearl, whose last words were prophetically inscribed on Koch’s tombstone, cannot but add to his personal legend.
    One of the many areas in which he had a direct impact was in the arts.  Koch was brilliant throughout his life in incorporating the media and performing arts into the life of the city and into his own publicity – creating a sort of natural cameo-style appearance genre that gave life and personality to the city through spokespersons such as him.  Koch gave many such cameo appearances including First Wives Club, Muppets Take Manhattan and Sex and the City.  Koch may not have been “mayor for life”, but he was definitely its “designated spokesperson for life.”
    Koch’s passion was seemingly for media and the performing arts.  He wrote a number of books, including a biography and is being hailed as the only mayor in America to have an off-Broadway musical biography.  An autobiographical film, Koch, opened in theatres on Friday.
    Politically, Koch took the helm of the city at a time when it was literally facing bankruptcy.  He installed affordable, responsible government and took the case for his policies directly to the people.  He turned the city around and is generally credited with helping inaugurate one of the city’s longest-running building and gentrification booms.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Paul Emsley presents Catharine, Duchess of Cambridge


When Royal Portraits go Bad

Emsley's controversial 2013 portrait
   Royal portrait commissions have a long history.  Henry VIII commissioned the English court painter Hans Holbein to go paint the otherwise unseen Anne of Cleves to determine whether or not she was marriage material.  Apparently, Holbein and her portrait thought yes.  Henry disagreed and art historians have long puzzled over how Holbein did not lose his head.
    Royal portraitist and first prize 2007 BP Portrait Award recipient, Paul Emsley is possibly grateful that times have changed (and that his subject is already safely married to William, Duke of Cambridge).
    Despite the Duchess’ polite claims to the contrary, her first official portrait as an HRH could have come off better.  Less polite critics have labeled Emsley’s effort as disappointing, even renaming the work, vampire princess, noting that the portrait more seemingly resembles the style of the popular Twilight films than a royal portrait.

   Why should we care?  Royal portraits do more than introduce a sovereign to his or her people, they are a record of the generations to which they belong.  Two hundred years from now, schoolchildren will visit the Royal Portrait Gallery for insights as to the lives and personalities of their great-great-great grandparents.  Kate's portrait is more than an idle curiosity to us for she is our ambassador to the ages and this is how she will be formally presented. 

Monday, January 28, 2013

Jonesing for Depth



Quinn's Planet, courtesy London Telegraph

Jonathan Jones Joneses for Artistic Depth

    In his 21 January review, Jonathan Jones, arts and culture critic for London’s The Guardian Newspaper, dropped the gauntlet over popular British artist Marc Quinn’s giant baby sculpture, Planet, and its installation in Singapore’s scenic Gardens by the Sea.
    Jones’ criticism is direct rather than rhetorical.  Does art need to be deep?  Inaccessible?  Clever?  Challenging?  How is it that we will choose to determine what is or is not considered art in a foundation-less (stated positively) Postmodern global culture? 
    I do enjoy The Guardian’s often thoughtful criticism, and appreciate Jones’ perspective in this case, but too often, I also wonder if The Guardian is not merely the UK’s contra-cultural, anti-establishment perspective – often appearing disagreeable merely to disagree. 
Quinn and Planet at Singapore installation, courtesy Artnews.com
    Indeed, there appears to be some disagreement with Jones’ perception.  Artnews.com confidently judges, “Planet is one of Marc Quinn’s most important works. The sculpture, which is a depiction of the artist’s infant son, appears to float above the ground and is a technical tour-de-force,” (Artnews, below).
    I think that in consideration of today’s cultural norms, Jones is being a bit hypercritical.  Consider the fate and present veneration of The Pearl, formerly at the heart of Manama, Bahrain. 

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Cheaper by the Baker's Dozen


 1.      Francis Picabia, Volupté (1932), $130K
2.      Joan Miró, Femme (Femme debout) (1969), $4.5M -$8M
3.      Joan Miró, Femme, étoile (1942), $500K-$800K.
4.      Joan Miró, L’echelle d’évasion (Escape Ladder) (1939), $800K - $1.3M
5.      Joan Miró, Signes et figurations, $1M- $1.5M
6.      Joan Miró, Tête (1970), $800K - $1.1M
7.      Max Ernst, La Forêt (1934/35), $50K-$80K
8.      Max Ernst, Roter Gratenwald mit Sonne (Red Forest with Sun) (1936), $650K-$1M
9.      Paul Delvaux, ecce homo (la descendre de croix) (1949), $1M - $1.4M
10.   Paul Delvaux, La Première Rose (1947), $1.6M - $2.4M
11.   Paul Delvaux, Les nymphes des eaux (1938).  $5M-$8M
12.   René Magritte, A la rencontre du plaisir (1950), $2M-$3M
13.   René Magritte, La traverse difficile (II) (1946), $400K-$600K
14.   opt.  Edvard Munch, Robat pa sjøen (1904), $1M
 


Cheaper by the Baker’s Dozen


Or… if I had $10 Million Dollars … I’d Buy Us a … Miró, a Delvaux and a Munch

    I would never actually advise anyone as to what art they should or should not consider purchasing, but while reading Hedley Twidle’s interesting article about South African Nobel Literary Laureate John M. Coetzee in the Financial Times, I noted the advertisement for Christie’s upcoming Surrealist Art Auction in London (08 Feb, 2013), and could not resisting clicking on the teaser icon.  Hmmm, I see…”
    Truthfully, I have a love and hate relationship with Surrealism, but many of the pieces in this particular auction draw closer to Modernism than to Surrealism, though all are definitely impacted by Surrealist forms and theory.  The first few selections in their slide show did not hold my attention.  They were fine, but not of the quality or the creativity I would expect for those prices.  But after imagining the excitement the wives of attorneys, Freshmen Congressmen and the other Long Island types whom I assume bid on such pieces, I caught a glimpse of Joan Miró’s Femme – a large, brilliant sculpture in black matte-finish bronze … And the expected price range for the piece?  A mere $4.5 million.  “Nice – I’d sure like to see the commission on that one,”  I thought to myself.
    Going through the slideshow catalogue, I noted several other Miró’s that I felt to be rather special and a few other works by other artists, ending up with a baker’s dozen-or-so that I felt would be well worth the trip to view.  The combined recommended minimum for the full dozen, roughly a cool $19.5 Millions – not really so bad if you really think about it.